Performer vs performer rpm dyno. They're listed as having different RPM ranges, but the Edelbrock...

Performer vs performer rpm dyno. They're listed as having different RPM ranges, but the Edelbrock website shows them having identical spec's and flow rates. Performer RPM - Deciding between the two. Mar 23, 2010 · Re: Any difference between the Performer and the Performer RPM by 347guy » Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:59 am The rpm is a better intake from 3000-3500 up. Just flow bench comparison, which does not always translate to a running engine. Wondering if anyone has switched from that to an rpm or rpm airgap and what performance was noticed? Thanks!! Aug 14, 2020 · I bought a used engine, minus the intake and carb. Dynojet is the world leader in performance enhancement products for motorcycles and cars. I originally ra Oct 16, 2010 · Im running a 383 (zz383) but with the e-tec 200 heads, the performer's performance has me 259 rwhp @ 4800 rpm on the dyno with q-jet, best of 13. 2@104 at the track, will have some more dyno numbers everything the same but with the rpm air gap in a week or so. I ran a 440 combination that was similar for 10 years with the performer intake. Jun 27, 2005 · Performer vs Performer RPM and more Pontiac - Street Nov 21, 2002 · I know what the difference between the two are, however, the Performer is more a stock replacement right? I was looking at the dyno charts that Edelbrock provided for a 302cid and it seems that the torque looks exactly the same if not worse than stock. jqcy nkkb aaxb xkxx ehuyywm seo khpzsp oiodsoz qqgzi tpyq